Seven ‘Dirty Words’ Words You Can’t Say About Healthcare

Seven WordsSo…how are we now to tell people what’s good or bad mental health care?

This past week, President Trump directed officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to cease using seven terms, including “diversity,” “vulnerable,” “science-based,” and “evidence-based.” While as amusing as comedian George Carlin’s routine, this move leaves many social services, health, and behavioral health leaders befuddled as to what the administration believes should guide professionals and advocates in our responses to people who are seeking help for adversities that have impacted their lives.

Mental health and addiction care have forever been magnets for well-marketed remedies without regard to any documentation that they will help or even harm people. Over centuries, these have ranged from sadistic physical measures to some psychotropic medicines that did more damage than good to a bevy of “snake oil” and body-assaulting remedies, some that continue to abound in the marketplace today.

I will never forget conversations I had with a tearful psychiatrist, Dr. William Turner, an early board member at Clubhouse of Suffolk, who painfully lamented his participation in the 1930s in lobotomies at Long Island State hospitals and the VA.  I also recall a tour of our nation’s first public hospital in Williamsburg, opened in 1773 by Virginia’s Governor as the “Public Hospital for Persons of Insane and Disordered Minds” where tools of torture were used – purported science that could cure “persons who are so unhappy as to be deprived of their reason.”  Treatments “consisted of restraint, strong drugs, plunge baths and other ‘shock’ water treatments, bleeding, blistering salves…(and later included) an electro-static machine.” Virginia’s Governor hailed these treatments as “science” for “diseases of the brain and nervous system, and the mentally ill (who) chose to be irrational.”

So, pursuant to this CDC directive, what shall become the most-trusted source for care recommendations to people who ask for help for themselves or loved ones? Some considerations, I guess, might include:

  • Social media optimization: “What treatments are approved as: ‘Facebook-Friendly Care,’ ‘Highly-Twittered Help,’ or ‘Most-Instagrammed Treatment’? Of course, the repeal of net neutrality may mean “pay-to-play” competition among healthcare providers to promote their products and services.
  • Spiritual guidance: “What treatment does God want me to pursue?” (Note: Many wonderful clergy leaders have been working with behavioral health leaders to help ensure that their congregants can access the most responsible information.)
  • Bartender or illegal drug dealer: “Sir, I want to stop using your products and services. Who can best help me?” Or, more progressive:
  • Apple-directed care options: “Siri, who should I go see to help me with my mental health problem?”

To be fair, behavioral health care has not always been adequately directed by “best science.” But, we remain at a time when there are mounting major challenges to helping people access mental health and substance abuse care. These include combating stigma, a workforce that is not sufficiently competent culturally or linguistically, forthcoming Medicaid cuts, and inadequate networks and payment confusion in insurance and managed care companies. (A “shout-out” to the just-released “Project Access” report by North Shore Child Guidance’s CEO Andy Malekoff and his colleagues!).

Amid our nation’s opioid and suicide crises, which includes our military Veterans, this censorship of health care communication imposed on our leading health safety organization just doesn’t seem helpful.

Advertisements

Michael Stoltz has been at the agency’s leadership helm since 1990, first as Executive Director of the predecessor organization, Clubhouse of Suffolk, and since July 2014, the CEO of the Association for Mental Health and Wellness (MHAW). MHAW is the result of the merger of Clubhouse with Suffolk County United Veterans and the Mental Health Association in Suffolk County.                                                                                                                                             Under Michael’s stewardship, the agency has grown to one with an $10 million annual operating budget, 150 employees, servicing more than 3,000 people each year through its Ronkonkoma, Riverhead, and Yaphank facilities.                                                                                                                                               A social worker by training, Michael received his MSW in 1982 from Adelphi University, where he has served as an Adjunct Professor teaching Social Welfare Policy and Human Service Management. He served as a Program Supervisor, developing and implementing the Suffolk County Intensive Case Management Program, as well as positions in management and direct service at several Long Island outpatient clinics.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in CDC, Centers for Disease Control, health, mental health, Politics, Veterans, wellness
2 comments on “Seven ‘Dirty Words’ Words You Can’t Say About Healthcare
  1. Caroline Baisley, MSW says:

    It is very frustrating as both a mental health consumer and a social worker that this slippery slide is happening. Predictably, we are going to a place where human worth is the ability to make money. So much of what makes us human does not have a price tag & some of those who have given the most to society have struggled with mental illness. Will we survive this time before a mandate comes down that we should stop trying to categorize the mentally ill (in an effort to help them) & just write them all off as “losers?”

    Like

  2. Don Friedman says:

    Nice suggestions, Mike. I noticed that the new mandate included alternative language to science- or evidence-based. It was something like “looking at the science, and also bearing community concerns in mind as well.” To me that meant that, for example, in a community that doesn’t believe in such a thing as science, you wouldn’t want to offend them by suggesting that your views are valid because based on 12,000 thorough, high quality scientific studies…

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Association for Mental Health and Wellness
631-471-7242

Enter your email address to follow my blog and receive notifications of new posts.

%d bloggers like this: