Our New Health Policy in 140 Characters or Less

I was listening to a radio talk show early Friday morning after the Republican House and President celebrated the rapid passage of their version of repeal of the ACA. While the radio hosts missed the irony, the program cut to an advertisement for a genetic testing company that was promoting its product, touting that it could tell us with a simple biological test the extent of risk we possessed for all types of cancers.

I recalled hearing testimony as part of the Welfare to Work Commission’s 2012 report on Suffolk County poverty where many people spoke of losing everything owned because they were denied treatment by insurers for a relapse in a health condition like breast cancer. The ACA, of course, subsequently eliminated this line of inconsideration by insurance companies.

Tests that might predict such risk weren’t really in significant use pre-ACA. But its potential repeal now re-opens this question – and many more – of what will constitute a “pre-existing condition.” I have personal and family health histories that amount to a WebMD volume of conditions, encompassing both physical and mental health. I know I’m already screwed with respect to possible excising of coverage for a host of conditions I’ve actually experienced, including two types of cancer. I know my risks of worsening or relapse of my conditions, so I do what I can to maintain a healthy lifestyle in order to minimize my risks.

But, what if I take a test and learn that I also have a 10 percent chance of Alzheimer’s or other conditions I have not yet experienced? Will this new information preclude me from coverage or care by a commercial insurer? If I don’t take the test, and nobody knows my pre-disposition, am I still eligible for coverage for that and related conditions? Or, will my insurer get really “progressive” and require diagnostic tests before telling me how much my insurance will cost?

How about new data from the population health world that indicates that even more than our genetic code, it’s our zip code that is often a strong determinant of our health and our healthcare needs? Just like homeowners and auto insurance, will our access to health insurance vary by the neighborhood we choose? (One gnarly congressman was quoted Thursday, “well you will always have the right to move.”).

I told the financial planners in my Rotary Club that they are in a great place under Trumpcare because we will all have to put off retirement pretty much until death so we can put away more dollars just in case any of our loved ones gets sick or disabled…or worse.

This issue will require a lot of public information at a time when fewer people consider information that comes in a form containing more than 140 characters. Some can endure a Facebook post (especially if there’s a funny video) and a few enlightened people will dig deeper and read a one-page blog or two. Recall how the brief non-fact of “Obamacare death panels” impacted public opinion during the ACA debate.

Another House Member admitted Thursday that he didn’t even read the bill, brief as it was, before voting on it. That’s the new stylistic challenge for the President: To issue a profound Tweet that will make good public policy, be it health care, taxes, immigration, or launching a missile attack.

It sure seems unfair that the people who are making the rules and are responsible for thinking through the all their implications are themselves exempt from the impact of the new rules.

Michael Stoltz has been at the agency’s leadership helm since 1990, first as Executive Director of the predecessor organization, Clubhouse of Suffolk, and since July 2014, the CEO of the Association for Mental Health and Wellness (MHAW). MHAW is the result of the merger of Clubhouse with Suffolk County United Veterans and the Mental Health Association in Suffolk County.                                                                                                                                             Under Michael’s stewardship, the agency has grown to one with an $10 million annual operating budget, 150 employees, servicing more than 3,000 people each year through its Ronkonkoma, Riverhead, and Yaphank facilities. A social worker by training, Michael received his MSW in 1982 from Adelphi University, where he has served as an Adjunct Professor teaching Social Welfare Policy and Human Service Management. He served as a Program Supervisor, developing and implementing the Suffolk County Intensive Case Management Program, as well as positions in management and direct service at several Long Island outpatient clinics.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Affordable Care Act, health, mental health, Politics, wellness
2 comments on “Our New Health Policy in 140 Characters or Less
  1. Nancy O says:

    Seems we’re seeing an upsurge in Apathy, alienation, anomie…… ” ignorance = fear, silence = death…….” Remember that one? Time to “Rise Up” from the Clamp down and Overcome this nasty smog of a force that hangs over us….. Thanks for the well stated 140 Michael!!


  2. Sally Ruocco McDonald says:

    Hi, it is very sad that people are making policy that effects the entire country without being informed on what they are voting on. Doesn’t anyone care about the people who put them in office. Maybe it is time for all voters to wake up and clean house next election.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Association for Mental Health and Wellness

Enter your email address to follow my blog and receive notifications of new posts.

%d bloggers like this: